Sat, Nov 21, 2009 Hello Anonymous! | Sign Out | Account Settings
Rate This Blog
3 rating(s)
Categories
Latest Entries
Loading...
Policy and Advocacy
Search:
November 2008
Tuesday November 25, 2008
The Next Step...
Posted by: CARE at 5:38PM EST on November 25, 2008
$0With renewed enthusiasm and support, American voters have asked for change. Elected officials from all political parties will come together soon to deliver on the hopes and dreams of their constituents, and allocating government funds is sure to be at the forefront of debate.$0 $0This year, President-Elect Obama will write his first budget proposal for Congress and set the tone for his administration. While recent progress has been made to place increased emphasis on fighting poverty, and the president-elect has been supportive, more can be done. Take action now to make sure the United States continues to do its part!$0 $0Right now, the president-elect and his administration are preparing the fiscal year 2010 federal budget, which will be presented before Congress in the new year. Now is the time to voice your support for programs that make a difference in the lives of poor communities around the world. We need your help to ensure that vital humanitarian and development programs, which are critical in the fight against global poverty, are adequately fundedWe need your help to ensure that vital humanitarian and development programs, which are critical in the fight against global poverty, are adequately funded.$0 $0Letters are currently circulating in the House House and Senate Senate calling on President-Elect Obama to request a robust international affairs budget. Please send a message to your representative and senators todayPlease send a message to your representative and senators today, urging them to add their names to this important letter.$0 $0Your action will send a strong message to your elected officials that their constituents support investments in poverty-fighting humanitarian and development assistance. Please, contact your legislators today and ask them to support funding for these critical programs.Please, contact your legislators today and ask them to support funding for these critical programs.$0 $0Thank you for standing with CARE.$0
The Next Step...
Posted by: CARE at 5:38PM EST on November 25, 2008
With renewed enthusiasm and support, American voters have asked for change. Elected officials from all political parties will come together soon to deliver on the hopes and dreams of their constituents, and allocating government funds is sure to be at the forefront of debate.

This year, President-Elect Obama will write his first budget proposal for Congress and set the tone for his administration. While recent progress has been made to place increased emphasis on fighting poverty, and the president-elect has been supportive, more can be done. Take action now to make sure the United States continues to do its part!

Right now, the president-elect and his administration are preparing the fiscal year 2010 federal budget, which will be presented before Congress in the new year. Now is the time to voice your support for programs that make a difference in the lives of poor communities around the world. We need your help to ensure that vital humanitarian and development programs, which are critical in the fight against global poverty, are adequately funded.  Letters are currently circulating in the House House and Senate Senate calling on President-Elect Obama to request a robust international affairs budget. Please send a message to your representative and senators today, urging them to add their names to this important letter.

Your action will send a strong message to your elected officials that their constituents support investments in poverty-fighting humanitarian and development assistance. Please, contact your legislators today and ask them to support funding for these critical programs.

Thank you for standing with CARE.
Monday November 3, 2008
Chellie Pingree Discusses Global Poverty
Posted by: CARE at 9:22AM EST on November 3, 2008
Here is what Chellie Pingree (ME-01) had to say...

One of the most effective strategies for addressing maternal health is to focus on strengthening health systems. Do you support increased funding to strengthen health systems in developing countries?
Yes, I would absolutely support increasing funding for programs to improve health systems in developing countries. I believe that health care is a basic right, and I have been guided by that principle throughout my life and my years in the Maine State Senate, where I fought consistently for health care access and affordability for Maine citizens, particularly women and children.

Every year over 500,000 women in the developing world die during pregnancy. How can we cut down on these preventable deaths?
This high fatality rate is appalling and tragic, and I would support efforts to reverse this trend, through increased funding for family planning services and quality health care. I would also support efforts to address inequities in terms of education and opportunity, as well as societal stigmas that may prevent women from accessing the services they need.

Less than one-half of one percent (<.005) of the U.S. federal budget funds poverty-fighting U.S. foreign assistance programs. Do you support increasing the poverty-focused areas of the foreign assistance budget?
Yes, I would absolutely support increasing funding for crucial poverty fighting programs in the foreign assistance budget.

Recent international polls show that the United States' global image has diminished, even among key allies. What role should foreign assistance programs to help the poorest and most vulnerable play in rebuilding our tarnished reputation?
The U.S. has a long way to go to restore our standing as a diplomatic partner in the international community – fully engaging in and supporting efforts to reduce poverty would go a long way towards repairing our global standing and relationships, and I am a strong proponent of expanding the United States' work in this area.

Would you support the U.S. in establishing a national-level, mandatory cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Yes, I would definitely support a cap-and-trade system to curb our greenhouse gas emissions and begin to slow the disastrous effects of climate change. This is one of the greatest challenges we face today, but it is also an enormous opportunity for innovation in new energy sources and job creation.

How will you help people in extreme poverty adapt to the new climate conditions?
We can already see the dangerous effects of climate change in the United States – these effects will be magnified in areas of extreme poverty. It is our moral responsibility to address the impacts of global warming on these areas that will be hardest hit by natural disasters, disease, and environmental degradation. We can help by improving people's access to education, health care, and financial stability, so they are able to overcome the obstacles that a changing climate will present.

The United States is the only country to utilize "monetized food aid," a method by which grain is shipped from America to charities in the developing world, who then sell the grain in the local market and invest the proceeds for its own programs. How should this inefficient practice be reformed or should it be eliminated?
Shipping grain overseas is an inefficient and inflexible way to provide food aid to people in developing countries. Instead, we should consider providing people with the capacity to buy food from markets in their own area – giving them quicker access to wider varieties of local food, stimulating the local economy, and reducing the carbon emissions used in transporting grain. I believe we also need to take a more preventative approach to hunger – increasing people's access to financial stability, education, and basic health care and services goes a long way towards preventing hunger, and that should be our goal.

Would you support using taxpayer money to directly fund food security development programs instead of the current inefficient policies?
Yes.

Chellie Pingree Discusses Global Poverty
Posted by: CARE at 9:22AM EST on November 3, 2008
Here is what Chellie Pingree (ME-01) had to say...

One of the most effective strategies for addressing maternal health is to focus on strengthening health systems. Do you support increased funding to strengthen health systems in developing countries?
Yes, I would absolutely support increasing funding for programs to improve health systems in developing countries. I believe that health care is a basic right, and I have been guided by that principle throughout my life and my years in the Maine State Senate, where I fought consistently for health care access and affordability for Maine citizens, particularly women and children.

Every year over 500,000 women in the developing world die during pregnancy. How can we cut down on these preventable deaths?
This high fatality rate is appalling and tragic, and I would support efforts to reverse this trend, through increased funding for family planning services and quality health care. I would also support efforts to address inequities in terms of education and opportunity, as well as societal stigmas that may prevent women from accessing the services they need.

Less than one-half of one percent (<.005) of the U.S. federal budget funds poverty-fighting U.S. foreign assistance programs. Do you support increasing the poverty-focused areas of the foreign assistance budget?
Yes, I would absolutely support increasing funding for crucial poverty fighting programs in the foreign assistance budget.

Recent international polls show that the United States' global image has diminished, even among key allies. What role should foreign assistance programs to help the poorest and most vulnerable play in rebuilding our tarnished reputation?
The U.S. has a long way to go to restore our standing as a diplomatic partner in the international community – fully engaging in and supporting efforts to reduce poverty would go a long way towards repairing our global standing and relationships, and I am a strong proponent of expanding the United States' work in this area.

Would you support the U.S. in establishing a national-level, mandatory cap-and-trade system to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
Yes, I would definitely support a cap-and-trade system to curb our greenhouse gas emissions and begin to slow the disastrous effects of climate change. This is one of the greatest challenges we face today, but it is also an enormous opportunity for innovation in new energy sources and job creation.

How will you help people in extreme poverty adapt to the new climate conditions?
We can already see the dangerous effects of climate change in the United States – these effects will be magnified in areas of extreme poverty. It is our moral responsibility to address the impacts of global warming on these areas that will be hardest hit by natural disasters, disease, and environmental degradation. We can help by improving people's access to education, health care, and financial stability, so they are able to overcome the obstacles that a changing climate will present.

The United States is the only country to utilize "monetized food aid," a method by which grain is shipped from America to charities in the developing world, who then sell the grain in the local market and invest the proceeds for its own programs. How should this inefficient practice be reformed or should it be eliminated?
Shipping grain overseas is an inefficient and inflexible way to provide food aid to people in developing countries. Instead, we should consider providing people with the capacity to buy food from markets in their own area – giving them quicker access to wider varieties of local food, stimulating the local economy, and reducing the carbon emissions used in transporting grain. I believe we also need to take a more preventative approach to hunger – increasing people's access to financial stability, education, and basic health care and services goes a long way towards preventing hunger, and that should be our goal.

Would you support using taxpayer money to directly fund food security development programs instead of the current inefficient policies?
Yes.